GENUINECHRISTIANITY-COMPACT.ORG
Sexual Sin
Abstract: Homosexuals are sinners and God loves them nevertheless. He gives them over to a reprobate mind to do such things if they don't stop it; they are not born that way. To be a Christian and a Homo is absurd. Homosexuals are usually haters of God, Jesus and Christians.
Sexual sin is Satans answer to Gods family plans.
By the way homosexuality also means extermination of mankind as its cosequence and social effect.
And they want to tell you, that the homo is also inside you; you only have to let him out.
We don't care if you don't like our biblical view on homosexuality. Our inspiration is to tell the truth, about homosexual behaviour as well. And we go in depth, discover the background and the abysses homosexuals fall into.
Homosexual perversion is nothing new, you already find it in the book of Genesis, it tells about mass rape by sodomites.
Genesis 19 (KJV):
6 And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,
7 And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
10 But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door.
Leviticus 20 (KJV):
7 Sanctify yourselves therefore, and be ye holy: for I am the LORD your God.
8 And ye shall keep my statutes, and do them: I am the LORD which sanctify you.
15 And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.
Romans 1 (KJV):
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
Romans 6 (KJV):
23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
We want to find out why people fall into the pit of homosexuality, what the Bible (God) tells us about this sin, and how we can save the people that are lost by sodomie and prevent young people to get into the trap of homosexuality.
In the process of Paul's defining the sinfulness of man and the utter fallenness of man, he gives an illustration of the depth of man's sin by pointing out what is the worst earthly expression of man's fallenness, and that is homosexuality. He says in Romans verse 26 that women exchange the natural use for that which is against nature,
and in verse 27, likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working that which is unfitting and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error, which was fitting.
Paul deals with the essence of sin. That is, in verse 24 and 25, sin comes out of the heart. He deals with the extent of sin in verses 29 to 32, that it covers so many things. It extends over all kinds of behavior.
And then that very most heinous expression of sin, the sin of homosexuality, points up the utter fallenness of man. Because man is abandoned by God, man is left to the consequence of his own sinfulness, which is an ever-increasing compulsiveness in sin that drives him to horrifying ends.
Religion cannot restrain man. There is no way for religion to retard this sinfulness. Now we may say, "Well, I know some religious people, they're Mormons, or they're something else, and they're very moral outwardly." Well, the pressure of religion can make people conform outwardly because of peer pressure and the desire to belong and to appear self-righteous, but it cannot restrain what they feel inwardly.
And so, though not everyone goes to the limits of all of these expressions of sin, and though everyone does not go to these extents in sin, they are restrained by certain cultural pressures or certain peer pressures or whatever, but their hearts are unrestrained.
They are like the Pharisees, who outwardly are white and painted as if they were new, but inwardly are full of dead men's bones. And so, Paul has shown us the utter sinfulness of men.
The catalog in verses 29 to 31 is staggering, utterly staggering. But because of the fact that Paul singles out this sin of homosexuality in verses 26 and 27 as the mark of the depth of man's sinfulness, for this is not a perversion, this is an inversion.
It is not only a sin but it is an acceptable sin. Verse 32 says that they not only commit it but they have pleasure in those that commit it. We not only allow it but we appoint people to high positions who do it.
Homosexuality sounds very innocent when they portray it. But it is not. It has physical results that are so far-reaching they now have new classifications for diseases that occur only among homosexuals.
They have introduced not only foreign strains of venereal diseases, but foreign viruses heretofore unknown in medical science.
The VD clinic of San Francisco Department of Public Health has 75,000 patients a year; 70 to 80 percent are homosexual. And in a very real way there is built into this whole thing exactly what it says at the end of verse 27; there is a recompense of reward for their error that is fitting. In other words, there are built-in consequences.
We recite general comments of Dr. Milton Helpern, who was the former chief medical examiner for New York City. Quotes from his biography entitled, Where Death Delights. He says, quote — and he's not a Christian — he says, "It's not my role to condemn homosexuality as such and I leave it to the psychiatrists and psychologists to try to figure out why people practice homosexuality. Having performed 60,000 autopsies," he said, "it is high time that those who deviate from the norms should understand the risks. I don't know why it is so but it seems that the violent explosions of jealousy among homosexuals far exceed those of the jealousy of a man for a woman or a woman for a man."
And that's why, by the way, it says in verse 27 that they burn in their lust in an unnatural way.
He goes on, "The pent-up charges and energy of the homosexual relationship simply cannot be contained. When the explosive point is reached, the result is brutally violent. But this is the normal pattern of these homosexual attacks, the multiple stabbings, the senseless beatings that obviously must continue long after the victim dies. When we see these brutal multiple wound cases in a single victim, we just automatically assume that we're dealing with a homosexual victim and a homosexual attacker." End quote.
More recently, in a release from United Press International, it says, "Laws concerning homosexual activity between consenting adults are without foundation either in modern scientific theory or New Testament theology, two witnesses testified in a federal court." In other words, they're saying it’s foreign to the New Testament. On the one hand it's foreign to the Old Testament because they culturally explain it away. On the other hand, it's foreign to the New Testament because they just don't believe it and if they do believe it, they'll explain it some other way.
Homosexuality has so invaded the church, it has become so acceptable in the church that they're now actually interacting with the biblical data to try to explain it away. They want to belong in the church, they want to identify in the church. They want to find a place in the church, they want to be accepted in the church and in order to do that they want to interact with the biblical data. And so they're doing that, explaining it away one way or another.
Deuteronomy chapter 22 is an introduction to some things that are sort of connected to homosexuality that will help to kind of broaden your thinking. The first one is what is known as transvestism, from which the word transvestite comes. A transvestite is someone who likes to wears the clothes of the opposite sex.
And in verse 5 of Deuteronomy 22 it says, "The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment, for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God."
Now some people say this means women are not allowed to wear slacks. The problem with that is men didn't wear slacks in that day. What it is saying is that a woman is not to wear that which pertaineth to the man. And the term is so broad that the Hebrew word refers to clothes, it also refers to weapons and tools and implements and utensils and jewelry and ornaments and anything else. And the point is that whatever tends to obliterate the distinctiveness between the sexes is forbidden. It is an abomination.
And many pagans indulged in this kind of exchange. For example, Maimonides writing mentions that a man dressed in fancy woman's clothes came to honor Venus and Asteroth and a woman dressed in man's armor worshiped at the shrine of Mars.
The people who worshiped Asteroth often exchanged male and female dresses. In fact, if you study the idolatry of the ancient times, you will be amazed to find out that sometimes the gods appear as men, and sometimes they appear as women. Sometimes they represent the male and other times they represent the female, and the worshipers would do the same kind of flip-flop. So tied with much of pagan idolatry was this obliteration of the clear distinction between male and female. And of course that fits the satanic effort.
But anything like that was an abomination to God, an outrage, an indecency, because it obliterated the fact that God had made them male and female. Such behavior fostered softness and effeminacy in the man and impudence and boldness in the woman. So transvestism is an abomination.
Anything that exchanges or tends to obliterate the sexes is an abomination to God.
And then there is such a thing called transexualism. People come along and claim they're women trapped in men's bodies and they go have an operation to change their sex. And then they say they're liberated. Well the Bible speaks of that, too. In chapter 23 of Deuteronomy verse 1, "The one wounded in the stones or hath his privy member cut off shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord." Anyone who would entertain this kind of thing has no place among God's people. To enter the congregation of the Lord means either admission to public honor or public office in the state of Israel.
Or in the case of a foreigner it meant incorporation into the nation, either by circumcision, obviously, or by marriage. In other words, God wanted no such people. They were excluded from the full rights and privileges of citizenship among God's people because they had defiled the image of God, they had perverted their creation. And the pagans, of course, commonly made eunuchs and many parents even mutilated their children to prepare them for service to the idols. And this was always a satanic practice.
God offers grace to such people. According to Isaiah 56 verse 3, "Neither let the son of a foreigner that hath joined himself to the Lord speak saying, ‘The Lord hath utterly separated me from His people,’ neither let the eunuch say, ‘Behold I'm a dry tree.’" In other words, if you've done this, you don't have to be totally despairing, "for thus saith the Lord unto the eunuchs that keep My Sabbath and choose the things that please Me and take hold of My covenant, even unto them will I give in Mine house and within Mine walls a place and a name better than a name of sons and daughters and I will give them an everlasting name that shall not be cut off."
That's pretty practical. You may cut some things off, but you'll never cut that everlasting name off, if they come to Me in faith. So God offers grace to the transsexual or the eunuch.
But we want to focus our attention on the subject of homosexuality itself, which is women engagingin sexual acts with women and men engaging in sexual acts with men.
Now like all other sinners, and we're all the same, people who are caught in the sin of homosexuality invariably attempt to justify their sin. And once you get into that kind of a perversion it is such a burning consuming deviation, it is such an utterly dominating kind of sin that they don't want out, they just to justify it. You see, it is the legacy of sin that it pushes itself deeper and deeper into the pit because it is the consequence of the outworking of the wrath of God. And so many of them don't even look for a way out, many do; but many of them don't look for a way out, they just invent things that go deeper and deeper into this sin. And then when they want to justify it and seem religious, they use the Bible.
And the first and foremost thing they say is that David and Jonathan had a homosexual relationship. I picked up a copy of one of the Bible studies from the Metropolitan Community Church, which is a homosexual church. And it says in there, "The Bible shows that the blessing of the Lord can rest on a homosexual by giving us the example of David, who was a man after God's own heart and obviously had a relationship with Jonathan."
And they say the following points prove this. "He never had a successful ongoing relationship with a woman." How they know ?
"He loved Jonathan as his own soul. Jonathan stripped himself and kissed David. David at this point acceded,
or gave himself to Jonathan. And David stated that he loved Jonathan more than he could love a woman."
Now perversion is one thing and an inversion is something else. But to try to justify your inversion by making the Word of God fit it is the ultimate blasphemy. 1 Samuel chapter 18, while all of us are pouncing with both feet on the homosexuals, may we also remember the list in Romans 1 verses 29 to 31 which may identify a little more with us but is equally heinous to God and just as forgivable.
1 Samuel 18 (KJV):
1 And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.
2 And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house.
3 Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul.
4 And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle.
But in 1 Samuel 18 they say, verse 1, "It came to pass when he had ceased speaking unto Saul that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David and Jonathan loved him as his own soul."
Now the only reason you see homosexuality in that verse is if you've got a problem.
Verse 3, "Jonathan and David made a covenant because he loved him as his own soul and Jonathan
stripped himself with a robe that was upon him and gave it to David."
Now if you see homosexuality in that, then you truly manifest the fact that you have no concept at all of what love can be. There's no justification for that. There's nothing in the text that says that.
In fact, in verse 12, "Saul was afraid of David because the Lord was with him.” The Lord was with him. Would God have blessed him if he was so engaged in sin?
In the nineteenth chapter verse 1, "Saul spoke to Jonathan, his son, and all his servants, they should kill David, but Jonathan, Saul's son, delighted much in David."
And they want to give sexual implications to "delighted," which is ridiculous. It means only that he was so highly pleased and so drawn to the very special character of this man David.
In chapter 20 verse 3 they take this phrase, "Thy father certainly knoweth that I have found grace in thine eyes." The idea that he found favor, that they became friends, and they twist and pervert that
into homosexual relationship.
And then they go to chapter 20 verse 30. And here's where they really load the guns. "Saul's anger was kindled against Jonathan. He said to him, ‘Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman,’" said that to his own son, "Do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse to thine own shame and unto the shame of thy mother's nakedness?"
And they say that Saul is accusing him of being a homosexual. There may be that overtone in it, a veiled reference to Genesis chapter 9 in which there could be some indication of a homosexual implication. But you certainly can't be sure that that's what he said, and even if he did say that, that would be what we would expect from somebody as twisted and as jealous and as fearful as Saul, right?
And then in verse 41, "As soon as the lad was gone David rose out of a place toward the south, fell on his face to the ground, bowed himself three times, they kissed one another and wept one with another till David finally controlled himself." And they say this is some kind of a homosexual kiss. It's obviously not. The weeping and the emotion and this is not a kiss as defined a kiss in the twentieth century. This was an embrace that men made, this was a holy kiss, the common exchange of greeting in the East.
And if you want to know how David felt about homosexuals, 2 Samuel 3:29 will tell you. And David is speaking and he says, "Let it rest on the head of Joab and on all his father's house and let there never cease from the house of Joab, (for his murder, of course, of Abner,) let there never cease from that house one who has an issue (somebody with a medical problem), or one who is a leper or who leans on a staff, or who falleth on the sword (commit suicide), or lacks bread (or starves)." And the key phrase is the one who leans on a staff. The word is to lean on a spindle. "May they have always an effeminate son who weaves thread, leans on a spindle." That's what David implied as a part of a curse.
And even though 2 Samuel 1:26 says that David said to Jonathan, "Thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women," we are not to assume that it was some illicit kind of thing. In the days of David women were kept in harems. Women were pampered but women were not the friends of men.
The exchange of ideas and the exchange of ideals and the exchange of concepts and the exchange of feelings was a man to man thing which surpassed the possibility of a relationship with a woman. David had a marvelous relationship with a man whom he esteemed and loved with a kind of love that is not a man to woman love, that's all it's saying. And they twist and pervert that.
We must recognize that this goes on. And this is what people do with the Bible. We gave you an illustration of what they do to justify their sin. But let's look very specifically at the Scripture. We ought to begin at the beginning, Genesis 1 verse 27.
“So, God created man in His own image. In the image of God created He him, male and female created He them." Male, female; there was no third type. This was not a cultural condition. This is a divine creation.
"And then they two were to be one flesh," and two men can't be one flesh and two women can't be one flesh. For the greatest indication of that one flesh is the product of a child, which is the perfect one-flesh result of the two.
Now if you understand the basic creation of God, you can begin to see what happens to pervert this. God creates male and female, puts them together, says this is it, one man, one woman for life. Immediately Satan begins to pervert it and it comes very rapidly.
In chapter 12 of Genesis — verse 17 you have the threat of adultery. In chapter 19 of Genesis you have the threat in verse 36 of incest. In chapter 34 of Genesis verse 2, the threat of rape. In chapter 38 verse 15 and following: the threat of prostitution.
And finally in chapter 19 of Genesis: the threat of homosexuality. All of these to pervert and adulterate God's intention. You might also add along the way, Lamech and the sin of polygamy. But all of these Satan brought about against God's order of male and female marriage for life.
Go to chapter 19 and this is the classic passage on the issue. The city is Sodom. God and two angels have just visited Abraham. You remember that there was a dispute between the herdsmen of Lot and the herdsmen of Abram and Abram said, you take the side of the country that you want.
“And he pitched his tent toward Sodom.” He played with sin and he wound up in a terrifying situation.
Two angels and God visited Abraham but only two angels went to Sodom. God wouldn't go. So in verse 19, "The two angels came at evening and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom and Lot, seeing them, rose up to meet them and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground and said, ‘Behold now, my lords, turn in I pray you into your servant’s house and tarry all night and wash your feet. You shall rise up early and go on your way.’" Now angels can appear in physical form, they appear as men in bodies. And so he invites them in and says let me care for you. And they said, "Nay, we'll just abide in the street all night." And Lot, in effect, said, you don't understand Sodom, you'll never survive it.
"And he pressed upon them greatly and so they turned in unto him and entered into his house. And he made them a feast and did bake unleavened bread and they did eat. But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, allthe people from every quarter."
Now here come all the men of Sodom, old ones, young ones from all over the city and they surround Lot's house. "And they called unto Lot and said unto him, ‘Where are the men who came into thee this night? Bring them out unto us that we may know them.’" What does that mean? We'd like to introduce ourselves? Well, I didn't get their name, we'd like to be pen pals. “We may know them.”
Well, it's very clear what it means in Genesis. “Cain knew his wife and she bore a child.” To know someone is the intimacy of the union that produces a child in marriage. They were talking about a sexual encounter. And Lot knew it, "So he went out at the door to them and shut the door behind him and said, ‘I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly. Behold now, I have two daughters who have notknown man. Let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you."
O Lot. Lot could...Lot would rather have them have a fornicating relationship with his daughters than a homosexual one.
"Do ye to them as it is good in your eyes. Only unto these men do nothing because they have come under my roof for my protection. And they said, ‘Stand back.’"
They weren't interested in women. "And they said again,
‘This one fellow came in to sojourn and he will needs be a judge. Now will we deal worse with thee than with them.’ And they pressed hard against the man, even Lot, and came near to break down the door."
This is the burning.
It's not uncommon for a homosexual to have over 300 different partners in one year. And this was something new for them. They had never met these two before.
"But the men put forth their hands," that is the angelic beings in the house, "and they pulled Lot into the house and shut the door. And then they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness." They instantly made them all blind.
Now what do you think their reaction was? Do they run in horror? No, it says, "They wearied themselves trying to find the door."
You see, the burning is so tremendous that even in their blindness their lust overruled and they tried to find the door in the blackness of their own sightlessness.
"And the men said unto Lot, ‘Hast thou here any besides, son-in-law, thy sons and thy daughters and whatsoever thy hast in the city, bring them out of this place for we will destroy this place.’"
You know what Troy Perry (Metropolitan Community Church, L.A.) said? He said God destroyed that city because of a lack of hospitality.The word "know them," doesn't necessarily mean sexual knowledge, say the homosexuals. But if you study its use in the Old Testament that is definitely what it means in this context. And that city was not judged for a lack of hospitality. Some other homosexuals say, "Well, the reason God judged it was because they were going to have that homosexual relationship without being married, but as long you're married to the man it's okay."
But what's interesting is that whenever the Bible refers...well, many times when the Bible refers to the sin of homosexuality in the future, it calls it the sin of sodomy, clearly indicative of what this sin was. It became a descriptive term for homosexuality.
There were multiple sins. According to Ezekiel, there were multiple sins for which Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed. But this was definitely one of them.
In 1 Kings, just trying to cover a couple of more passages here, chapter 14, verse 24,
"And there were also sodomites in the land." And this is talking about the time of terrible apostasy in Judah. "There were sodomites in the land and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the Lord cast out."
The term "sodomite" actually came to mean a male cultic prostitute, a male cultic prostitute, someone who functioned as a prostitute in some cult.
In Deuteronomy 23:17 it says, "There shall be no harlot of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of
the sons of Israel."
No harlots among the women and no harlots or male prostitutes among the men.
Now when there was one, what did God say to do? Look back at Leviticus chapter 18. Leviticus chapter 18 verse 22 says, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, it is abomination, neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself there with. Neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto. It is confusion."
Then he goes on to talk about defiling and the vomiting out of the land and so forth.
Then go over to chapter 20 verse 13. So we know it's an abomination. In chapter 20 verse 13, "If a man lies with mankind as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination, they shall surely be put to death and their blood shall be upon them." And so God's standard for this immoral thing was that it was an abomination and that the consequence was death. And yet in wonderful grace, as we saw in Isaiah, where there was repentance, there was full forgiveness and a special place in God's kingdom.
There's an account in Judges 19 of a similar nature. And it just talks about some base fellows in verse 22. They were making their hearts merry, getting drunk of course, probably. “And the men of the city, certain base fellows, beset the house round about and beat on the door and spoke to the master of the house, an old man, saying, ‘Bring forth the man who came into thine house that we may know him.’”
And there it's the same thing again. They wanted to have a homosexual relationship. "And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them and said unto them, ‘Nay, my brethren, nay I pray you, do not so wickedly, seeing that this man is come into mine house. Do not this folly. Here's my daughter." Here's another guy who would rather give up his daughter than to allow for this. "I will bring out now and humble ye them and do with them — that is the daughter, maiden, the concubine — do whatever you want but unto this man, do not so vile a thing." And that is a comment as to the vileness of it that gives us insight into how the people understood God's command.
Now the New Testament doesn't change anything. Look at Matthew 5. And we're just giving you the scriptures. We're not taking the time to go into every little argument. It's pretty clear. In Matthew 5 Jesus said, "Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets." He didn't come to change God's law, to destroy God's law, "but to fulfill it." He didn't come to negate the legal principle; He came to offer payment for its legal debt. He fulfilled the law, not by setting it aside but by paying what it demanded. Not only did He pay what it demanded in the virtue of His life but He did it in the virtue of His death as well. Jesus reiterated the purity of marriage. Jesus reiterated the divine standard with no change whatsoever. And so as you flow through the New Testament, the standard says the same.
Now look at Romans chapter 1. And we're right into the heart of the New Testament, the standard is the same. It is when men are corrupted and men are abandoned by God, that verse 26 says, the women exchange the natural use for that which is against nature, and the men, verse 27, do the very same, burning in their lust, men working with men that which is not fitting. Literally, the unseemly thing means the shameful thing.
It goes with apostasy. It goes with rebellion against God. The thought of a Christian gay person is utterly ridiculous. There could be a Christian who, just like any other sin, committed an act of homosexuality and for a Christian the Lord would forgive, wash it clean. But there couldn't be a Christian who went around defending that as if it were a righteous lifestyle. And there's a big difference.
Look at 1 Corinthians chapter 6 and see the next passage that deals with it. Verse 9, Paul says,
"Don't you know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God? Be not deceived. Neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor effeminate (That could well sort of pull together the transvestite, transsexual thought.) nor homosexuals."
And then in 11, "And such were some of you but you were washed." Why? Because that stuff was filthy, you see. You had to be washed from that, sanctified, justified. It is an incredible thing that the church could exist in a day when people say this is a righteous kind of lifestyle, an alternative. Paul says you've got to be washed of that stuff.
Imagine, the Parents and Friends of Christian Murderers or the Parents and Friends of Christian Fornicators. Wouldn't that be a nice organization?
The Parents and Friends of Christian Fornicators is having a luncheon. The Parents and Friends of
Christian Adulterers is having a picnic.
First Timothy chapter 1 verse 10 says, "The law of God is made to condemn.” And the ones that it’s made to condemn, verse 10, are fornicators. And the next one: "Those that defile themselves withmankind," that's homosexuals, fornicators and homosexuals, "and any other thing contrary to sound doctrine." The root for that term there is...It's actually sodomites. The root means to go to bed with a man. And that's contrary to sound doctrine.
Pull together what the Scripture says by having you look at the seventh verse of Jude, seventh verse of Jude. Here in Jude, God is showing His judgment on apostasy, showing His hatred and His condemnation of those who are apostates.
And he says if you want to see an example of judgment, if you want to see an example of God's condemning wrath, if you want to see the vengeance of a holy God against sin, look at Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, in like manner, because they were destroyed, because they were given over to fornication and a going after strange flesh and they are therefore set forth for an example suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Sodom and Gomorrah guilty of the sin of sodomy, of homosexuality, becomes the living illustration of God's vengeance in eternal damnation.
Romans 1, now here it comes, says this is how far they went, all the way to this vile thing. And Jude 7 says when God judged the city that did that, it became the living illustration of God's vengeance. And in a sense then Jude sort of modifies Romans 1. If Romans 1 is the worst sin, then the destruction of Sodom is the greatest illustration, do you see, of God's vengeance. And from one end of Scripture, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah becomes the byword for God's judgment.
Listen to Deuteronomy. Deuteronomy 29:23: And here God is warning,
"The whole land thereof is brimstone and salt and burning that is not sown nor bareth, nor any grass groweth therein, like the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah, which the Lord overthrew in His anger and in His wrath." He's warning His people, and Sodom and Gomorrah is the illustration.
In Deuteronomy chapter 32 and verse 32, "For their vine is the vine of Sodom and of the fields of Gomorrah. Their grapes are grapes of gall, their clusters are bitter, their wine is the poison of serpents and the cruel venom of asps. To me belongeth vengeance." It's just like Sodom, He says.
The prophet Isaiah, chapter 1, says, "Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire, your land foreigners devoured in your presence and it is desolate as overthrown by foreigners. Except the Lord of host had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been like Sodom."
Again the illustration that Sodom is the picture of devastation.
Isaiah 3:9: "The show of their countenance doth witness against them and they declare their sin like Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul." In the thirteenth chapter of Isaiah we find again how Isaiah uses Sodom as the illustration, verse 19, "And Babylon the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldeans, excellency shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah."
And you will go into the book of Jeremiah and you will find Sodom and Gomorrah is his illustration of judgment.
And then you will go to the book of Ezekiel and you will find it is his illustration of judgment.
You will find it in the fourth chapter of Lamentations.
You will find it in the fourth chapter of Amos.
You will find it in the second chapter of Zephaniah.
You will find our Lord used it in the tenth chapter of Matthew and in the eleventh chapter of Matthew and in the tenth of Luke and the seventeenth of Luke.
And Paul uses it in the ninth of Romans and Peter in 2 Peter 2, and John in Revelation 11.
Over and over again Sodom becomes the illustration of God's vengeance.
If this is the worst sin, then Sodom and Gomorrah's judgment is the severest exercise of God's vengeance. And the sad thing is when the church accepts this and people accept it. You know what's sad about it?
People say, "Oh, you're not loving; you're not being kind to those people."
You want to know something? If you want to really do a job on them and damn them to hell forever, just
tell them it's OK to do that.
But if you want to help them, then tell them it’s sin, because until they see it as sin they cannot come to God for forgiveness, right? Don't say it's unloving. Hey, we all were saved out of some sin but we weren’t saved until we knew we were in sin and needed a Savior, right?
There's no such thing as a homosexual in a technical sense; there are just people who choose to do homosexual sins.
And some supposed new report came out and said, "Well, we now believe it's something you're born with."
That's right. You're born with a wretched rotten sin nature. And because of certain temptations and certain problems, some people go that way into that kind of sin. But it is a perversion of God's design. It is not something that's a result of your genetic structure, it's not something you can't help, it's not the fault of your dominating mother or your passive father, although they may contribute to the temptation problem, it's a choice you make. And you choose to do it and you choose to keep on doing it or you choose to be
changed.
And you know what's so wonderful? When you realize that it isn't something you're born with but it's a sin, then you realize you can be delivered from it like any other sin. That's essentially, you know, a liberating thing.
End